PODCAST: Australia’s defence procurement is narrowing and becoming less resilient, with 127 East Advisory’s Colin Storey

Joint-capabilities
|
By: Robyn Tongol

Australia’s defence industry faces a period of growing consolidation and uncertainty, how is past procurement impacting national security of the future?

Australia’s defence industry faces a period of growing consolidation and uncertainty, how is past procurement impacting national security of the future?

Speaking with Defence Connect news editor Robert Dougherty, 127 East Advisory director Colin Storey, a former head of growth at Raytheon and Royal Australian Navy patrol boat navigator, discusses his analysis of major defence contracts awarded over the past decade and what the data reveals about Australia’s defence industrial base.

Storey’s analysis of 373 contracts found more than 27 per cent went directly through foreign military sales, while more than half of the remaining contracts went to foreign-owned companies operating in Australia.

 
 

Of the Australian-owned businesses receiving major contracts, much of the spending was concentrated in areas such as infrastructure, facilities and fuel, with Austal emerging as the only Australian-owned defence specialist among the top 20 recipients.

The pair also discuss the gradual offshore consolidation of Australia’s defence industry, with major international primes acquiring at least 16 Australian companies over the past four decades.

Combined with the growing cost of major programs and the funding demands of AUKUS, Storey warns this approach could place further pressure on established defence companies, with some potentially reconsidering their long-term presence in Australia.

The pair examine how countries including Sweden, Norway, Finland and Israel have developed successful defence companies by aligning procurement with national priorities, supporting specialised sovereign capabilities and helping domestic firms access export markets.

Looking towards the next decade, Storey expects further consolidation across the Australian defence industry, alongside increased mergers and acquisitions as companies compete for a smaller number of major programs. Australia risks developing a narrower and less resilient defence industrial base unless procurement, sovereign capability and export policy are more closely aligned with the nation’s long-term defence strategy, he warns.

Enjoy the podcast,
The Defence Connect team

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Defence Connect a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Defence Connect as a preferred news source.

Tags:

Listen to previous episodes of the Defence Connect podcast:

Episode 11: PODCAST: Australia’s UGV dilemma and why land autonomy remains stuck in the mud, with Stephen Bornstein
Episode 10: SPOTLIGHT: Building resilience against next-generation cyber threats, with Fortinet
Episode 9: SPOTLIGHT: Quantum technology could reshape Australia’s defence advantage, with Fujitsu Australia
Episode 8: PODCAST: Digital engineering, GWEO, and the future of guided weapons, with Australian Missile Corporation and Dassault Systèmes
Episode 7: CONTESTED GROUND: Is Australia’s political discontent becoming a national security problem?
Episode 6: SPOTLIGHT: The hidden defence advantage of Australia’s commercial logistics network
Episode 5: PODCAST: The broad church – why Pine Gap remains the focal point of Australia’s anti-bases movement
Episode 4: SPOTLIGHT: From assembly to manufacturing – how Port Wakefield transforms Australian missile capability
Episode 3: PODCAST: Drones over Williamtown, radar exports and Australia’s evolving defence partnerships
Episode 2: SPOTLIGHT: Cyber loyal wingmen – how frontier AI transforms Defence from defender disadvantage to asymmetric advantage