US approves US$250m training package to support Australia’s Super Hornet, Growler fleets
The United States has approved a potential foreign military sale to Australia valued at approximately US$250 million ($362.3 milli...
PODCAST: Defence export ambitions, drone technology and defence manufacturing hubs
Questions remain around how Australia can grow sovereign capability while responding to evolving strategic challenges. ...
Defence Delivery Agency will bring significant reform not past mistakes, pledges Conroy
Australian defence industry minister Pat Conroy has pledged that the upcoming Defence Delivery Agency will promote significant ref...
100th Boxer mechanised infantry vehicle delivered to UK Ministry of Defence
Team Boxer UK has announced delivery of the 100th Boxer Mechanised Infantry Vehicle to the UK Ministry of Defence. ...

Labor flags change back to traditional defence portfolio

Joint-capabilities
|
By: Reporter
labor flags change back to traditional defence portfolio
Opposition spokesman for Defence Richard Marles

Australia appointed its first Defence Industry Minister in 2016, but opposition spokesman for defence Richard Marles has questioned the value of this position and has said Labor would take a more traditional approach to the portfolio if elected to government at the next federal election.

Australia appointed its first Defence Industry Minister in 2016, but opposition spokesman for defence Richard Marles has questioned the value of this position and has said Labor would take a more traditional approach to the portfolio if elected to government at the next federal election.

Speaking to Defence Connect, the former minister for trade made no secret of the fact that those in government saw the appointment as a political 'fix', rather than a necessity for the defence portfolio.

"I think everyone in the industry and the defence community knows this is a political fix to deal with personnel issues that the government has within its own ranks," Marles said.

 
 

"It doesn't make sense in terms of how you structure this portfolio. We would be approaching this in a much more traditional way, having a single defence minister."

The Victorian MP also spoke of some confusion created by the division of the portfolio between Minister for Defence Industry Christopher Pyne and Defence Minister Marise Payne.

"I get that [confused industry members] all the time. Which is why it doesn't make sense, exactly what the division of responsibility is doesn't make sense. It took a long time to actually see that division of responsibility be spelt out in the government documentation. There's an obvious cross over. Defence industry is the other side of the coin on the fence.

"Our view is there needs to be one person who has strategic oversight of that space, which is how it's been up until last year. That's what would happen if Labor is elected to government in the next election."

To hear more from the Labor representative, tune in to our exclusive podcast here.

Want to see more stories from trusted news sources?
Make Defence Connect a preferred news source on Google.
Click here to add Defence Connect as a preferred news source.

Tags: