Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Labor committed to future subs but questions remain

dcns fsp

Opposition spokesman on defence Richard Marles has confirmed Labor’s continuing support for Australias Future Submarine Program, but has labelled the federal governments approach to the bidding process for SEA 1000 as an “epic mistake”.

Opposition spokesman on defence Richard Marles has confirmed Labor’s continuing support for Australias Future Submarine Program, but has labelled the federal governments approach to the bidding process for SEA 1000 as an “epic mistake”.

The Coalition decided on French company Naval Group to build Australia's next generation of submarines, in a deal that will cost $50 billion. Marles criticised the government for not contesting a $340 million price-tag for the design process for Naval Group, but concedes little can be changed lest there be a sovereign risk.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"In the context of a $50 billion spend it makes no competitive sense at all that the government did not contest a $340 million design," Marles said at the Submarine Institute of Australia.

"One only needs to think of the competitive pressure this would have placed on the other $49 billio of expenditure to realise that this mistake will ultimately cost the Australian taxpayer billions."

The opposition defence spokesman accused the Coalition of leaving the nation in a "weak" bargaining position that could haunt Australia for years to come.

SPONSORED CONTENT

 

"It is a tale of ineptitude in respect of the biggest and most important procurement in our history," he said.

Marles also referenced the Australian National Audit Office's report into the Naval Shipbuilding Program, with the report labelling the naval construction program as "high to extreme risk". Marles said the government has "shrugged off" the assessment. 

Labor also raised the possibility that by the time SEA 1000 is ready to enter service in the early 2030s, submarines may not carry the same importance, if scientists are able to "lift the veil" of the ocean and minimise the stealth advantage subs carry.

The opposition, however, confirmed that they view the Future Submarine Program as "the focal point of Australia's contemporary military procurement", saying that submarines are currently the most important strategical asset in military affairs. The capabilities of SEA 1000 are to be vital in Australia dealing with “the most complex set of strategic circumstances since the Second World War”, according to Marles.

With more than half of the world's submarines expected to be operating within the Indo-Pacific region, Marles said the way Australia handles this increase in maritime traffic will "determine the safety and prosperity of every Australian throughout this century".

"The more we can build influence and shape affairs the more we are empowered. Central to this is a highly capable Australian Defence Force. And the pointy end of this capability is submarines." said Marles.

Labor committed to future subs but questions remain
DCNS-FSP-1.jpg
lawyersweekly logo

more from defence connect

Jul 10 2020
Combining simulation, visualisation and the human element to deliver next-gen defence capability
UNSW has responded to a growing need within defence industry to leverage the growing capabilities of...
Jul 10 2020
'Stoking the fire': Griffith analyst slams Indo-Pacific arms race
As part of the $270 billion dished out to defence over the coming decade, Australia will join the re...
Jul 10 2020
The fundamental flaw in the ‘Defence of Australia’ strategy and constantly rehashing it
It has formed the basis of Australia’s defensive doctrine since the 1980s, but the Defence of Aust...
FROM THE WEB
Recommended by Spike Native Network