Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
defence connect logo

Powered by MOMENTUMMEDIA

Powered by MOMENTUMMEDIA

Naval Shipbuilding Plan lacks detail: SA government

naval shipbuilding plan lacks detail  sa government
Collins Class HMAS Sheean which will be replaced under the $89 billion Future Submarine Program

The South Australian government says that a great deal of work is still needed to provide the detail required to build the defence industry capability outlined in the federal government’s Naval Shipbuilding Plan.

The South Australian government says that a great deal of work is still needed to provide the detail required to build the defence industry capability outlined in the federal government’s Naval Shipbuilding Plan.

SA Minister for Defence Industries Martin Hamilton-Smith has criticised the plan and is calling for mandated levels of Australian industry participation to be worked into construction contracts.

"The Naval Shipbuilding Plan lacks detail about how much of the $89 billion naval shipbuilding program will be spent in Australia," said Minister Hamilton-Smith.

==============
==============

"We are calling for mandated levels of Australian industry participation to be written into construction contracts for future projects once design activities are complete; in particular the $50 billion Future Submarine program."

The release of the plan comes after the SA government last week agreed to terms for the $230 million sale of Techport to the Australian government, a move that will both ensure reimbursement for the state’s significant investment in the facility and enable a clear path for the Australian government to expedite Offshore Patrol Vessel, Future Frigate and Future Submarine programs.

Minister Hamilton-Smith said that while the state's defence industry is capable of competing with, and aiding, the global industry, SMEs are struggling to survive from lack of indigenous work and programs.

"Our defence industry has proven that it is capable of competing at an international level," he said.

"The third ship of the Air Warfare Destroyer program is now meeting international benchmarks with our Collins Class submarines exceeding benchmarks for submarine availability.

"South Australia’s small and medium enterprises who are working on the Air Warfare Destroyer program are already struggling to survive as work on that program comes to an end."

The minister said a mandate for maximum Australian industry participation would hep to stabilise these businesses moving forward.

"The Australian government must stand up for our industry and mandate 90 per cent Australian industry participation on the 2018 Offshore Patrol Vessel Program to stabilise the naval shipbuilding supply chain and increase industrial capability," Minister Hamilton-Smith said.

"The Australian government’s 2015 RAND report, Australia’s Naval Shipbuilding Enterprise, estimates up to 8.5 million hours of unproductive labour on the Future Frigate program should there not be sufficient industrial capability preserved from the Air Warfare Destroyer program."

The Naval Shipbuilding Plan also outlined that a $535 million investment in infrastructure upgrades at Osborne’s shipbuilding facility is due to start in the second half of 2017, following consideration of detailed design and awarding of contracts.

A similar amount has been identified for the upgrade of submarine infrastructure on the site. The SA government will partner with the Australian government to facilitate in the delivery of critical infrastructure, assisting with approvals and re-zoning of land. Completion of the shipbuilding infrastructure development is expected to be completed by the second half of 2019, but the report warns that it is time-critical that this occurs to enable the Future Frigate program to commence on time by 2020.

"South Australia stands ready to work with the Australian government to ensure an efficient build of the required infrastructure at Osborne and ensuring creation of the highly-skilled workforce required for future programs in the state," Minister Hamilton-Smith stated.