Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Labor weighs in on nuclear submarine debate

labor weighs in on nuclear submarine debate
Opposition defence spokesmen Richard Marles

As tensions among members of the Liberal party heat up, with Defence Minister Marise Payne shooting down former prime minister Tony Abbott’s calls for nuclear submarines, Defence Connect spoke with opposition defence spokesman Richard Marles about Labors hopes for the Future Submarine Program.

While Abbott was complimentary of Labor's history across issues of national security and was confident the party would be supportive of nuclear submarines if a "strong national security case were to be made", Marles questioned the logistics of such a move.


"I mean the issue of nuclear – given that we don't have a civil nuclear industry in Australia right now – I mean obviously a huge question is posed right there," said Marles.

The former minister for trade said the Labor party was more focused on ensuring ongoing commitment and bipartisanship to Australian shipbuilding capability.

"We feel that we have dragged the government to a place where they are now committed to building 12 subs. You know we were the first party to make that clear that we need 12 submarines in terms of the future procurement. We feel like we’ve been dragging the government to a place where those submarines are now being built committed to being built  in Australia, and built in South Australia," Marles said.

"Our focus really is on ensuring that there is bi-partisanship around that, that the focus here is about the existing program in relation to the submarine build happening in Australia, 12 subs that [can] be done right and done as quickly as possible, and I think it is important that there is some bi-partisanship around that."



While Abbott admitted there would be questions of costs associated with building nuclear submarines, he suggested Australia could start smaller and build a combination of conventionally powered and nuclear powered submarines.

"Because of the engineering requirements, nuclear submarines are invariably more expensive to build and operate than conventional ones," Abbott noted.

"On the other hand, even nine (say) nuclear powered submarines could more than do the work of 12 conventional boats."

Australia selected Naval Group, formerly known as DCNS, as the Australian government's preferred international partner for the design of 12 Future Submarines for the Royal Australian Navy in 2016 over bids from Germany and Japan.

The first of the 12 submarines is likely to begin entering service in the early 2030s. Construction of the 12 new submarines will extend into the late 2040s to 2050 timeframe.


Labor weighs in on nuclear submarine debate
lawyersweekly logo

more from defence connect

Oct 16 2019
Photo Essay: HMA Ships arrive in Guam
HMA Ships Stuart, Parramatta and Hobart have arrived in Guam as part of the Royal Australian Navy's ...
Oct 16 2019
South Korea doubles down with new, expanded aircraft carrier plans
Drawing inspiration from the resurgent Royal Navy, South Korea is preparing two plans for a conventi...
Oct 16 2019
Dibb Report 2.0: Paul Dibb enters the ‘Defending Australia’ debate
Renowned Australian strategic policy expert Paul Dibb has launched a scathing assessment of the nati...
Recommended by Spike Native Network