defence connect logo

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

The character of the modern battlefield and role of the digital warrior

Opinion: Major General (Retd) Rupert Jones CBE analyses the degree to which technology has changed the way that we fight across battlefields from Ukraine to Mosul.

Opinion: Major General (Retd) Rupert Jones CBE analyses the degree to which technology has changed the way that we fight across battlefields from Ukraine to Mosul.

Most of us are seduced to some degree by the lure and potential of groundbreaking technology. It excites and promises a bridge from the fictional possibilities portrayed in films into our lives. The same applies in Defence where we are often led to hope and believe that Information Age technology has already fundamentally transformed the way we fight. But is that the reality? How much has technology really changed the experience of soldiers in Ukraine or in Mosul? As always, the answer is probably nuanced: much has changed, but plenty has not. 


My observations are based on 30 years of military experience, and in particular, draw on 13 months in 2016-17 as the Deputy Commander of the US-led coalition that defeated ISIS (Da’esh) in Iraq and Syria. The deployment coincided with the nine-month battle to liberate Mosul, Iraq’s second city, (arguably the most significant urban battle since World War II) and the six-month battle for Raqqah, the capital of Da’esh’s so-called caliphate. These battles combined some of the most sophisticated technologies available to any militaries on the planet, delivered by the US and her allies, with tactics and equipment that were decades old (largely delivered by the Iraqi Security Forces and our Syrian partners).

There has been extensive commentary about the inept performance and ill-discipline of the Russian military in Ukraine; some better informed than others. However, there has been rather less discussion examining just how difficult it is to successfully orchestrate the full panoply of the 21st century arsenal (combined arms manoeuvre) amid the chaos and confusion of war. It is exceptionally hard. There is no more challenging or complex human endeavour than prevailing in battle; anyone who thinks that there is has clearly never set foot into the theatre of war. So, criticism of the Russian performance is justified, but their woes should serve to remind us of how hard it is to fight and win; there are cautionary lessons for Western militaries.

Technology has arguably only made the plight of the soldier harder as enemies enjoy the same advances, making many tactics obsolete and technologies vulnerable. However, there are no absolutes in this. Judgements that images of destroyed Russian armour confirm the death-knell of the tank are likely premature. Rather, they act as another reminder that the different arms of war must be operated in concert with each other; tanks without infantry, artillery, engineers and air support will be destroyed. Fought together, they will likely remain an invaluable part of army inventories for some time yet. 

General Sir Patrick Sanders, who leads UK’s Strategic Command and will shortly take over as head of the British Army, said last year in a speech that he had “more need of Q, than I do of 007 or M”. There are few, if any, more shrewd and capable people in uniform today than Sanders and drawing from James Bond ensured a clever and quotable soundbite. He was making a much-needed rallying call for Defence to do much better at attracting and harnessing digital warriors. The modern battlefield needs data engineers, cyber operators, and computer programmers every bit as much as traditional combat warriors. The British military, along with our friends in America, Canada, Australia and elsewhere, are wrestling with this challenge. How can they attract digital warriors in a highly competitive employment market, and how can they ensure that they are valued and hold equal status to the traditional warrior? 

Western military strategists talk extensively about their aspiration to avoid war in cities and about how technology can give them the edge. The reality is that war is, and has always been, about people, and so cities will retain their magnetic draw on the fight. We are seeing this in Ukraine, and it was the same in liberating Iraq where the campaign was a series of urban battles: Ramadi, Fallujah, Mosul, and Tal Afar among others. 


Today’s militaries require a subtle mix of conventional and digital warriors. On the front line, young men and women are needed who can endure the brutal nature of war, as old as the hills, while exploiting the best technology we can give them; as comfortable with their rifle as with situational awareness applications that aim to give them an edge over their foe. Equally, militaries must compete for the attention of the most digitally talented. These young people are in high demand and understand their value to employers. They are readily drawn to tech companies, but our Armed Forces can offer fulfilment and purpose that is in short supply elsewhere. The challenge continues to be how to persuade enough of the right people to see a career in uniform as being something to consider. This is not easy and more compelling narratives are needed, together with building Defence’s technical reputation.

Additionally, we often do not recognise the potential of those already working with us. Aptitude testing frequently highlights the greatest digital potential among those we have underestimated. Identifying and harnessing potential and initiative offers great value. 

The Australian digital skills start-up, WithYouWithMe, which has recently launched into the UK and is helping British Army regiments to do just this. One regiment recently put every soldier through WithYouWithMe’s aptitude testing, offering the commanding officer invaluable insights into the potential skills at his disposal. The firm is now delivering a free six-week digital bootcamp to turn their potential into digital skills, allowing the regiment to compete more effectively on the battlefield. 

Events in Ukraine have acted as a stark reminder that we can ill-afford to take national security for granted. Partnership with industry will be key to assist our Armed Forces to digitally transform, while retaining the hard-edged skills that have secured victory on battlefields from Normandy to the Falklands to Kiev.

This article contains many contradictions which reflects two things. First, that there are no binary answers between the need for hard-edged tools and techniques of war, and the digital arsenal to prevail in the digital combat arena. Second, that this is a complex issue demanding greater airtime, and urgent debate and collaboration.

Major General Jones draws on 30 years of leadership experience in the British Army. Promoted as the youngest major general at the time, his focus was on overseas operations, commanding in Northern Ireland, Bosnia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and the Caribbean. He enjoys a proven track record working with multinational and inter-agency teams to deliver in the most challenging and complex international crisis situations. 

He recently left the military and is now working as an advisor. Among other roles, he is resident expert to the Oxford Foundry entrepreneur accelerator program and advisor to the Australian firm, WithYouWithMe. 


The character of the modern battlefield and role of the digital warrior
lawyersweekly logo

more from defence connect

Jul 1 2022
Cyber businesses encouraged to take part in defence awards
As Defence Connect eagerly gears up to host the 2022 Australian Defence Industry Awards, we’re encouraging all defence cyber bus...
Jul 4 2022
HMAS Supply trials Phalanx close-in weapon system (CIWS)
Defence has confirmed that the HMAS Supply has successfully undertaken a trial of the Phalanx close-in weapon system as part of ...
Jul 4 2022
HMAS Ararat decommissioned in Top End
The patrol boat will no longer represent the Royal Australian Navy on official deployments after 16 years in service. ...