Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Home / key enablers / State v state tenders ‘inefficient’

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

State v state tenders ‘inefficient’

State v state tenders ‘inefficient’

Former parliamentary secretary for defence procurement and current Victorian defence industry advocate Greg Combet has lambasted the current bidding model for defence industry contracts, labelling it as “less than optimal”.

Speaking to Defence Connect, Combet has criticised the method of allowing multiple states to compete and tender for various defence projects, even expressing disappointment in the LAND 400 tendering process, a project for which Victoria is a strong tenderer.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"There's no working together on LAND 400, and largely because of the way the procurement has been conducted by the Commonwealth. The states were essentially invited to compete and to treat with the bidders to try and attract them and that's led to a less than optimal economic outcome, in my opinion," said Combet.

"I've got a funny, I suppose, background for this because having been a Commonwealth government defence procurement minister, I know how inefficient it is to have the states competing in this way."

The former trade unionist has said the current process is beneficial to the federal government as it allows it to pass on the costs to the states.

"What it is is a cost transfer from the Commonwealth to the states. Instead of picking up any of the tab for the infrastructure, for example, Defence shifts all of that to the states who are out there competing amongst each other," Combet said.

"And the extent to which prime contractors then discount their tender price for the infrastructure that's laid on and the cash incentives that's laid on by the states, is moot, I think. And that's a less than optimal outcome for taxpayers."

Currently, South Australia, Victoria and Queensland are bidding for LAND 400 work that will see the construction of the next generation of Armoured Fighting Vehicles (AFV) and deliver replacements for the Australian Light Armoured Vehicle (ASLAV) and M113 Armoured Personnel Carrier (APC) fleets.

State v state tenders ‘inefficient’
boxing.jpg
lawyersweekly logo

more from defence connect

May 26 2019
PM announces new look Defence portfolio appointments
Prime Minister Scott Morrison has officially revealed his new look Cabinet and Ministerial team with...
07:12
Defence Industry plays a key role in Indo-Pacific Endeavour 19
Australia’s defence industry capability has played a key role in the 2019 iteration of Indo-Pacifi...
07:12
US acquisition for Serco increases naval systems offering
Serco Asia Pacific has welcomed Serco Group’s acquisition of the Naval Systems Business Unit (NSBU...
FROM THE WEB
Recommended by Spike Native Network