Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
Exclusive
Airbus backs long-haul AIC approach for JP 9102 push:

Website Notifications

Get notifications in real-time for staying up to date with content that matters to you.

Future Submarine acquisition presents mammoth capability gap

dcns shortfin barracuda closeup

A report conducted by former public servants and defence analysts has warned the schedule of the $50 billion Future Submarine Project could put Australia at risk at a time when regional tensions are on the rise.

A report conducted by former public servants and defence analysts has warned the schedule of the $50 billion Future Submarine Project could put Australia at risk at a time when regional tensions are on the rise.

The report, commissioned by Gary Johnston, founder of Jaycar Electronics and owner of the Submarines for Australia website, and led by former head of the Australian Public Service and former secretary of the Department of Finance Michael Keating, has said the risk of delays to the project, common among maritime projects, would drastically effect Australia's maritime defence capabilities.

Advertisement
Advertisement

"When the government announced the decision to make another custom piece of military hardware ... the alarm bells rang," Johnston said in the report's preface.

The report slams Defence's risk management assessment skills and suggests it should only have a military and technical advisory role.

"Defence doesn’t understand how to deal with risk when making investment decisions. When analysing alternative options for investment in military hardware, they need to involve people who are totally independent from the process, people with a financial or commercial background who understand how to generate better outcomes with an appropriate adjustment for risk. Of course, Defence would still have a role, but mainly as military and technical advisers," the report said.

Keating's analysis discusses the dramatic change of the project from its original plan in 2009 and concludes that Australia took the highest-risk, highest-cost option in the submarine decision and failed to consider alternatives.

"The question, therefore, is not whether the Navy needs to renew its submarine capability, but what would be the most appropriate type of submarine for the RAN and how many we need," the analysis reads.

PROMOTED CONTENT

Under the current schedule for the Future Submarine project, a new submarine is due to come into service in 2033, the same year the last of the Collins Class boats is due for decommissioning, presenting a sizable gap in capability for the RAN.

To address this, the report suggests buying six off-the-shelf submarines from France to help fill the gap between when the Collins fleet is decommissioned and the new fleet is ready.

Naval Group (formerly DCNS) was awarded the contract for the 12 Future Submarines last year, beating out bids from Germany and Japan.

Construction of the submarines will begin in 2021-22. Construction will extend into the late 2040s to 2050 timeframe.

 

Future Submarine acquisition presents mammoth capability gap
DCNS-Shortfin-Barracuda-closeup.jpg
lawyersweekly logo

more from defence connect

Jan 18 2022
Bisalloy Steel names new MD and CEO
A 30-year veteran of the industry has been appointed to lead the ASX-listed company. ...
Jan 18 2022
Overcoming quantity with quality: Can the British military withstand troop cuts?
Under the British government’s force structure plan, Downing Street has resolved to reduce the size of the British Army by 9,500...
Jan 18 2022
Leonardo secures AW169M LUH helicopter order
The prime has been awarded a contract to deliver a fleet of the twin-engine helicopters to Austria. ...