In terms of how to define exactly what constitutes a drone, Bartsch was clear.
“There are industry bodies in the consortium and other industry associations, but really it is knowing the drone is just simply a different type of aircraft,” he told Defence Connect.
“Really, you can't by definition differentiate between a drone and any other aircraft,” he added. “That's probably the main reason why the International Civil Aviation Organisation has so much difficulty in promulgating the regulations for it.”
Bartsch identified a key role for Australia in shaping the regulations, guidelines and terms of definition the ground-breaking technology.
“Even just a little way into the future, if we are able to get everybody together, Australia with its innovation and technology agenda, is perfectly positioned,” he said, highlighting “the fact that we've got this industry that's grown around the drone sector for the last 16 years”.
“We're ahead of the rest of the world,” said Bartsch. “But let's keep that competitive advantage and let's take the initiative and lead the rest of the world in this.”
He said that while for almost any other type of aircraft, international standards had been promulgated, in the case of drones this key aspect of aviation regulation was missing.
“There's no such international standards for drones,” added Bartsch. “That is what's going to hold us back [but] by the governments getting together, and Australia has been the leader in the international forum in this regard, we've got to get a standard.”
He said in this way it would become possible to operate drones consistently throughout the world “so it can be seamless between nations, but also seamless between the military and the civilian applications”.